I disagree

Wellman’s article argues that the mere existence of computer networks is social networks. He makes several very strong statements about how hardware is the foundation of social networks.

I disagree with his arguments due to the following points:

1. A computer can be fully connected to the internet without creating social capital. For example an office computer that uses basic word processing but is connected to the internet so it can get virus definitions updates.
2. There needs to exist an online community that follow Preece’s points to create social capital.
3. Arguing from a technology point of view, a network of computers can be meaningful with automated tasks. However, the network needs varied inputs (user interaction) in order to create added value.

Basically, you cannot just network a bunch of computers together and expect a social community to form. There has to be social value and meaning.

This article can be used to ponder about the technological aspects of hardware can impact an online community. For example, perhaps the stability / bandwidth of one web mail client over another will cause it to have a more developed community than the unstable web mail server.